PER CURIAM.
In this mental commitment case, appellant appeals a judgment of continued involuntary commitment. ORS 426.307(6). He contends that the state failed to prove, by clear and convincing evidence, that, because of a mental disorder, he is a danger to himself or others. ORS 426.005(1)(e)(A). The state concedes that the evidence is legally insufficient to support recommitment. We agree and accept the state's concession; accordingly, we reverse.
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.