PROVIDENCE HEALTH SYSTEM OREGON v. WALKER

0900276; A145132.

289 P.3d 256 (2012)

252 Or. App. 489

In the Matter of the Compensation of Joy M. Walker, Claimant. PROVIDENCE HEALTH SYSTEM OREGON, Petitioner, v. Joy M. WALKER, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided September 26, 2012.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Theodore P. Heus argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the briefs was Scheminske & Lyons, LLP.

Ronald A. Fontana , Portland, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief was Fontana & Takaro, P.C.

Before ARMSTRONG, Presiding Judge, and HASELTON, Chief Judge, and DUNCAN, Judge.


DUNCAN, J.

In this workers' compensation proceeding, we are asked to resolve three issues: (1) whether employer was obligated under ORS 656.262(7)(c)1 to reopen and process claimant's omitted condition claims after an administrative law judge (ALJ) had found the conditions compensable but while employer's appeal of the ALJ order was pending; (2) if employer was so obligated, whether employer fulfilled those obligations; and (3) if employer...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases