SMITH v. BOARD OF PAROLE AND POST-PRISON

A146029.

284 P.3d 1150 (2012)

250 Or. App. 345

Arlen SMITH, Petitioner, v. BOARD OF PAROLE AND POST-PRISON SUPERVISION, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided June 6, 2012.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Arlen Porter Smith filed the briefs pro se.

John R. Kroger , Attorney General, Mary H. Williams , Solicitor General, and Matthew J. Lysne , Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent.

Before ARMSTRONG, Presiding Judge, and HASELTON, Chief Judge, and DUNCAN, Judge.


ARMSTRONG, P.J.

In this proceeding pursuant to ORS 183.400,1 petitioner asserts, in his first assignment of error, that a notice-of-rights form used by the Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision (the board) constitutes a "rule" for purposes of the Administrative Procedures Act (the APA), ORS chapter 183, and is therefore invalid because it was adopted without compliance with the applicable rulemaking procedures. ORS 183.400(4)(c)...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases