1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.3d
  4. 279 P.3d
  5. 279 P.3d 290 (2012)
 

J.L.B. v. K.P.B.

10ST0043MA; A146463 (Control); 10ST0044MA; A146464.

279 P.3d 290 (2012)

250 Or. App. 122

J.L.B., Petitioner-Respondent, v. K.P.B., Respondent-Appellant. J.L.B., Petitioner-Respondent, v. E.P.B. and K.P.B., Respondents-Appellants.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided May 16, 2012.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Philip F. Schuster, II , Portland, argued the cause and filed the reply brief for appellants. On the opening brief were E.P.B. and K.P.B. , pro se.

Pete Meyers argued the cause and filed the brief for respondent.

Before ORTEGA, Presiding Judge, and SERCOMBE, Judge, and HADLOCK, Judge.

HADLOCK, J.

Respondents appeal the trial court's entry of two stalking protective orders (SPOs).1 The sole issue on appeal is the sufficiency of the evidence supporting those orders. Because this is not an "exceptional case" justifying de novo review, we review the trial court's factual findings for "any evidence" and its legal conclusions for errors of law. See Travis v. Strubel, 238 Or.App. 254

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases