S.A.B. v. ROACH

085168; A142587.

277 P.3d 628 (2012)

249 Or. App. 579

S.A.B., Petitioner-Respondent, v. Emmy M. ROACH, Respondent-Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided May 2, 2012.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Philip F. Schuster, II , Portland, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the briefs was Dierking & Schuster.

Richard S. White argued the cause and filed the brief for respondent.

Before ARMSTRONG, Presiding Judge, and HASELTON, Chief Judge, and DUNCAN, Judge.


DUNCAN, J.

Pursuant to ORS 30.866, petitioner sought and obtained a stalking protective order (SPO) against respondent, her neighbor.1 Respondent appeals, arguing that the court erred in concluding that she engaged in repeated, unwanted contacts that caused petitioner subjective and objectively reasonable alarm and coercion, as required under ORS 30.866. We conclude that the record establishes, at most, one qualifying contact within the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases