STATE v. N.R.L.

J090305; A144789.

277 P.3d 564 (2012)

249 Or. App. 321

In the Matter of N.R.L., a Youth. STATE of Oregon, Respondent, v. N.R. L., Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided April 11, 2012.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Christa Obold-Eshleman argued the cause and filed the briefs for appellant.

Cecil A. Reniche-Smith , Assistant Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent. With her on the brief were John R. Kroger , Attorney General, and Mary H. Williams , Solicitor General.

Before SCHUMAN, Presiding Judge, and WOLLHEIM, Judge, and NAKAMOTO, Judge.


NAKAMOTO, J.

Youth appeals the juvenile court's judgment that he pay restitution in the amount of $114,071.13. Youth argues that the juvenile court erred in denying his motion to empanel a jury because Article I, section 17, of the Oregon Constitution entitled him to a jury trial on the issue of restitution. Youth contends that the amendments to the restitution statute, ORS 419C.450, changed the statute's purpose from penal to "quasi-civil," which

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases