EXPEDITE DELIVERY SERV. v. EMPLOYMENT DEPT.

10AB1939; A146382.

274 P.3d 257 (2012)

248 Or. App. 750

EXPEDITE DELIVERY SERVICE, INC., Petitioner, v. EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided March 14, 2012.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Geordie Duckler , Portland, argued the cause and filed the brief for petitioner.

Karla H. Ferrall , Assistant Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent. With her on the brief were John R. Kroger , Attorney General, and Mary H. Williams , Solicitor General.

Before SCHUMAN, Presiding Judge, and WOLLHEIM, Judge, and NAKAMOTO, Judge.


PER CURIAM.

Petitioner, Expedite Delivery Service, Inc., seeks judicial review of an Employment Appeals Board (EAB) order affirming the administrative law judge's (ALJ) decision that claimant, who provided delivery driver services for petitioner, was not an independent contractor as the term is defined in ORS 657.040, and that claimant was not discharged for misconduct, ORS 657.176(2)(a). On review, petitioner assigns error to EAB's conclusion that claimant was petitioner...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases