WOODS v. HILL

CV07040400; A143387.

273 P.3d 354 (2012)

248 Or. App. 514

Mack A. WOODS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Gary D. HILL, Defendant-Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided March 7, 2012.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Michael J. Morris , Portland, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the briefs was Bennett, Hartman, Morris & Kaplan, LLP.

James C. Tait , Oregon City, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief was Tait & Associates, P. C.

Before ORTEGA, Presiding Judge, and SERCOMBE, Judge, and HADLOCK, Judge.


HADLOCK, J.

This action for legal malpractice is the epilogue to what this court previously has described as a series of "[p]rocedural misadventures."1 Defendant, an attorney, represented plaintiff in connection with the dissolution of plaintiff's marriage. The dissolution case was referred to court-annexed arbitration. Defendant then stipulated to "binding" arbitration with the proviso that neither party to the arbitration "waive[d] its...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases