T.M.B. v. HOLM

08BC2667; A142443.

273 P.3d 304 (2012)

248 Or. App. 414

T.M.B., Petitioner-Respondent, v. Stephen R. HOLM, Respondent-Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided February 29, 2012.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Andy Simrin argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief was Andy Simrin PC.

Roger Gould filed the brief for respondent.

Before HASELTON, Presiding Judge, and ARMSTRONG, Judge, and DUNCAN, Judge.


DUNCAN, J.

Petitioner sought, and was granted, a stalking protective order (SPO) against respondent. Respondent appeals, arguing that the trial court erred in considering respondent's speech and failing to require a culpable mental state with regard to petitioner's alarm from one of respondent's contacts of petitioner. We disagree. Therefore, we affirm.

Petitioner and respondent, who live in the same housing development, have opposing views regarding the authority...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases