PROCTOR v. CITY OF PORTLAND

090405208; A144782.

263 P.3d 1099 (2011)

245 Or. App. 378

Beth A. PROCTOR, an individual; and Diane E. Rulien, P.C., an Oregon professional corporation, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. CITY OF PORTLAND, an Oregon municipal corporation, Defendant-Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided September 8, 2011.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Michael T. Garone , Portland, argued the cause for appellants. With him on the briefs were Steve C. Morasch , Jill S. Gelineau , and Schwabe, Williamson & Wyatt, P.C.

Kenneth A. McGair argued the cause for respondent. On the brief was Shane E. Abma.

Before HASELTON, Presiding Judge, and ARMSTRONG, Judge, and DUNCAN, Judge.


HASELTON, P.J.

Plaintiffs, real estate brokers who sought damages and declaratory relief pertaining to the enforcement of defendant City of Portland's 2008-amended Business License Law, appeal. They challenge the trial court's allowance of the city's motion for partial summary judgment and its denial of their cross-motion for partial summary judgment. In so ruling, the trial court determined that, as amended, Chapter 7.02 of the Portland City Code (PCC) does not impose...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases