HASELTON, P.J.
Defendant, who was found guilty following a trial to the court on various sexual offenses, appeals. He contends that (1) the trial court erred in denying, in part, his motion to suppress inculpatory statements that he made during police interrogation; (2) the admission of a physician's expert diagnosis, in the absence of diagnostic physical findings, that complainant had been sexually abused constituted plain error under State v. Southard,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.