PER CURIAM.
Defendant was convicted of first-degree sodomy and first-degree sexual abuse. On appeal, he argues that the trial court erred in admitting an expert's diagnosis that the victim was sexually abused. The state concedes that the trial court erred in admitting the expert's diagnosis over defendant's objection, because the diagnosis was based purely on the victim's credibility and therefore amounted to impermissible vouching. State v. Lupoli,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.