PER CURIAM.
Defendant, who was convicted of being a felon in possession of a firearm, ORS 166.270(1), contends that the trial court erred in failing to instruct the jury that the state was required to prove a culpable mental state with respect to his status as a felon. In light of our decision in State v. Rainoldi,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.