1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.3d
  4. 249 P.3d
  5. 249 P.3d 158 (2011)
 

KAISER PERMANENTE v. BONFIGLIO

0703508; A141902.

249 P.3d 158 (2011)

241 Or. App. 287

In the Matter of the Compensation of Pamela Bonfiglio, Claimant. Kaiser PERMANENTE, Petitioner, v. Pamela BONFIGLIO, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided March 2, 2011.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Benjamin C. Debney argued the cause and filed the briefs for petitioner.

George J. Wall , Portland, argued the cause and filed the brief for respondent.

Before SCHUMAN, Presiding Judge, and WOLLHEIM, Judge, and ROSENBLUM, Judge.

SCHUMAN, P.J.

Employer, Kaiser Permanente, seeks review of an order of the Workers' Compensation Board setting aside employer's partial denial of claimant's "new or omitted medical condition" claim for right radial neuropathy, contending that substantial evidence does not support the board's finding that claimant's condition is compensable. We conclude that the board's order is supported by substantial evidence and affirm...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases