1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.3d
  4. 250 P.3d
  5. 250 P.3d 364 (2011)
 

WILCOX v. UMALI

072566; A141349.

250 P.3d 364 (2011)

241 Or. App. 124

Craig WILCOX, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Teri UMALI, aka Terri Umali, Defendant-Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided February 23, 2011.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

R. Daniel Lindahl , Portland, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the briefs was Lindahl Law Firm, PC.

Mark A. Gordon , Saint Helens, argued the cause and filed the brief for respondent.

Before ORTEGA, Presiding Judge, and SERCOMBE, Judge, and LANDAU, Judge pro tempore.

ORTEGA, P.J.

Plaintiff appeals from a judgment arising from a court-annexed arbitration. Although plaintiff timely filed a notice of appeal from the arbitration award, the trial court concluded that the notice was ineffective and therefore entered judgment on the arbitration award. The dispute is whether a party seeking a trial de novo after arbitration must file and serve a notice of appeal within 20 days of the filing of the award for the notice of appeal...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases