CLACKAMAS CTY. ASSESSOR v. VIL. AT MAIN ST.

(TC 4877; SC S057858).

245 P.3d 81 (2010)

349 Or. 330

CLACKAMAS COUNTY ASSESSOR, Appellant, v. VILLAGE AT MAIN STREET PHASE II, LLC, Respondent.

Supreme Court of Oregon, En Banc.

Decided December 9, 2010.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Kathleen J. Rastetter , Assistant County Counsel, Oregon City, argued the cause and filed the brief for appellant. With her on the brief was Clackamas County Counsel.

Donald H. Grim , Greene & Markley, P.C., Portland, argued the cause and filed the brief for respondent. With him on the brief was David P. Weiner.


KISTLER, J.

Once a tax assessor has determined the value of property and listed it on the assessment roll, the assessor may not correct the value listed on the assessment roll merely because he or she "would [now] arrive at a different opinion of value." ORS 311.205(1)(b).1 An assessor, however, may add property to the assessment roll that "has from any cause been omitted, in whole or in part," from the assessment roll. ORS 311.216. The...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases