COX v. M.A.L.

180711632; A140030.

244 P.3d 828 (2010)

239 Or. App. 350

Laura Rose COX, Petitioner-Respondent, v. M.A.L., Respondent-Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided December 8, 2010.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

C. Michael Arnold , Eugene, argued the cause and filed the brief for appellant.

No appearance for respondent.

Before HASELTON, Presiding Judge, and ARMSTRONG, Judge, and ROSENBLUM, Judge.


ARMSTRONG, J.

Respondent appeals an order denying his motion to seal the court file and other records stemming from a civil stalking proceeding against him, contending that the trial court had the inherent authority to seal the records after it had denied petitioner's request to enter a permanent stalking protective order (SPO) against respondent. Respondent further argues that the court abused its discretion in denying his motion, because removing the potential stigma...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases