ARMSTRONG, J.
Defendants appeal the trial court's grant of summary judgment to plaintiff for specific performance of a loan agreement and option to purchase defendants' real property. Defendants argue that the agreement is unenforceable—and, therefore, summary judgment was improper—because it violates Oregon's usury laws, is unconscionable, and constitutes an unlawful penalty for breach of contract. As explained below, we conclude that the trial court...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
