PER CURIAM.
Defendant appeals from his convictions on two counts of first-degree sexual abuse, arguing that the trial court erred in admitting expert testimony by a pediatrician diagnosing sexual abuse in the absence of any physical evidence. Defendant did not preserve that argument in the trial court, however, admission of such evidence is plain error under State v. Southard,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.