MONTGOMERY v. CITY OF DUNES CITY

2008135; A144619.

236 P.3d 750 (2010)

236 Or. App. 194

Alan MONTGOMERY, Respondent Cross-Petitioner, v. CITY OF DUNES CITY, Petitioner Cross-Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided July 7, 2010.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

David N. Allen argued the cause for petitioner-cross-respondent. With him on the briefs was Macpherson, Gintner & Diaz.

Bill Kloos, Eugene, argued the cause for respondent-cross-petitioner. With him on the brief was Law Office of Bill Kloos, PC.

Before HASELTON, Presiding Judge, and ARMSTRONG, Judge, and DUNCAN, Judge.


HASELTON, P.J.

Petitioner City of Dunes City (the city) seeks judicial review, and respondent Montgomery cross-petitions for judicial review, of an order of the Land Use Board of Appeals (LUBA) in which LUBA remanded the city's denial of respondent's application for the approval of a preliminary subdivision plat. We reject without discussion the city's two assignments of error concerning LUBA's application of the substantial evidence standard and its remand for the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases