1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.3d
  4. 234 P.3d
  5. 234 P.3d 967 (2010)
 

IN RE NEWELL

(OSB No. 07-142; SC S057231).

234 P.3d 967 (2010)

348 Or. 396

In re Complaint as to the Conduct of Robert D. NEWELL, Accused.

Supreme Court of Oregon.

Decided June 10, 2010.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mark J. Fucile, Fucile & Reising LLP, Portland, argued the cause and filed the briefs for the accused.

Mary A. Cooper, Assistant Disciplinary Counsel, Tigard, argued the cause and filed the brief for the Oregon State Bar.

Before DE MUNIZ, Chief Justice, and GILLETTE, DURHAM, BALMER, KISTLER, and LINDER, Justices.

PER CURIAM.

In this attorney discipline case, the Bar charged the accused with violating Rule of Professional Conduct (RPC) 4.2. Generally, that rule prohibits a lawyer from communicating on certain subjects with a person whom the lawyer knows is represented on those subjects. The trial panel found that the accused had violated Rule 4.2 and publicly reprimanded him.1 The accused has requested review from this court.

Greenwood Forest...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases