1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.3d
  4. 234 P.3d
  5. 234 P.3d 984 (2010)
 

INSKO v. MOSIER

050243064; A134151.

234 P.3d 984 (2010)

235 Or. App. 451

Thomas A. INSKO, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Donald MOSIER and Reisom Corporation T-16, aka Riesom Corporation, Defendants-Appellants, and John C. Nolin and Richard Meek, Defendants.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided June 9, 2010.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

George W. Kelly, Eugene, argued the cause and filed the briefs for appellants.

Joel DeVore, Eugene, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief was Luvaas Cobb.

Before LANDAU, Presiding Judge, and SCHUMAN, Judge, and ORTEGA, Judge.

LANDAU, P.J.

In this prescriptive easement case, the issue is whether plaintiff established adequate proof of his adverse use of an existing road located on land owned by defendants.1 The trial court found plaintiff's proof adequate and entered judgment granting a prescriptive easement over the road. Defendants appeal, arguing that plaintiff's proof that he used the existing road was insufficient, because there was inadequate evidence...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases