LASLEY v. COMBINED TRANSPORT, INC.

060808260; A137222.

227 P.3d 1200 (2010)

234 Or. App. 11

Clarence D. LASLEY, as personal representative for the Estate of Mark Alan Lasley, Plaintiff-Respondent Cross-Appellant, v. COMBINED TRANSPORT, INC., Defendant-Appellant Cross-Respondent, and Judy Marie Clemmer, Defendant-Respondent, Cross-Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided March 3, 2010.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Allyson S. Krueger, Portland, argued the cause for appellant — cross-respondent. With her on the briefs were Danny L. Hitt, Jr., and Hitt Hiller Monfils Williams LLP.

Stephen C. Hendricks, Portland, argued the cause for respondent — cross-appellant. With him on the briefs was Hendricks Law Firm, P.C.

Edward L. Daniels, Albany, argued the cause for respondent — cross-respondent. With him on the brief was Law Office of Daniels & Ivers.

Before SERCOMBE, Presiding Judge, and BREWER, Chief Judge, and ARMSTRONG, Judge.


BREWER, C.J.

This is an appeal by one of two defendants in a wrongful death action. Defendant Combined Transport appeals from a judgment for plaintiff. The jury found Combined Transport 22 percent at fault and the other defendant, Clemmer, 78 percent at fault. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand for a new trial.

Combined Transport is a trucking company that specializes in transporting large loads of glass...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases