1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.3d
  4. 227 P.3d
  5. 227 P.3d 758 (2010)
 

GOULD v. DESCHUTES COUNTY

2008203, A143430.

227 P.3d 758 (2010)

233 Or. App. 623

Annunziata GOULD, Petitioner Cross-Respondent, v. DESCHUTES COUNTY, Respondent, and Thornburgh Resort Company, LLC, Respondent Cross-Petitioner.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided February 24, 2010.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Paul D. Dewey argued the cause and filed the briefs for petitioner-cross-respondent.

Peter Livingston argued the cause for respondent-cross-petitioner. With him on the brief was Schwabe, Williamson & Wyatt, PC.

No appearance for respondent Deschutes County.

Before LANDAU, Presiding Judge, and SCHUMAN, Judge, and ORTEGA, Judge.

ORTEGA, J.

This petition and cross-petition for judicial review arise from a Land Use Board of Appeals (LUBA) decision that remanded Deschutes County's approval of the final master plan (FMP) for development of a destination resort by Thornburgh Resort Company, LLC (Thornburgh). The issues on review concern Thornburgh's fish and wildlife mitigation plans. Petitioner Gould argues that LUBA remanded too little to the county. On a cross-petition, Thornburgh contends...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases