DOYLE v. CITY OF MEDFORD

(USDC CV-06-03058-PA; USCA 07-35753; SC S057330).

227 P.3d 683 (2010)

347 Or. 564

Ronald DOYLE; Robert Deuel; Benedict Miller; and Charles Steinberg, Plaintiffs, v. CITY OF MEDFORD, an Oregon municipal corporation; and Michael Dyal, City Manager, City of Medford, in his official capacity and as an individual, Defendants.

Supreme Court of Oregon, En Banc.

Decided February 4, 2010.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Stephen L. Brischetto, Portland, argued the cause and filed the brief for plaintiffs. With him on the brief was George P. Fisher.

Robert E. Franz, Jr., Springfield, argued the cause and filed the brief for defendants.

Anil S. Karia and Michael J. Tedesco, Lake Oswego, filed a brief for amicus curiae International Brotherhood of Teamsters Local 223.


BALMER, J.

This case is before the court on a certified question of Oregon law from the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. See Doyle v. City of Medford, 565 F.3d 536 (9th Cir.2009) (certifying question); ORS 28.200-28.255 (granting authority to answer certified questions and describing procedure). Plaintiffs are retired employees of the City of Medford (the city) who brought an action against the city in...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases