1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.3d
  4. 223 P.3d
  5. 223 P.3d 1041 (2009)
 

STATE v. LUMAN

(CC 04102244; CA A132197; SC S056470).

223 P.3d 1041 (2009)

347 Or. 487

STATE of Oregon, Petitioner on Review, v. John Frederick LUMAN, Respondent on Review.

Supreme Court of Oregon, En Banc.

Decided December 31, 2009.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Janet A. Metcalf, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, argued the cause for petitioner on review. With her on the briefs were Hardy Myers, Attorney General, and Mary H. Williams, Solicitor General.

Chris Dunfield, Petersen, Dunfield & Fahy, Corvallis, argued the cause and filed the brief for respondent on review.

GILLETTE, J.

The state appeals from a Court of Appeals decision reversing a trial court order that denied in part defendant's motion to suppress evidence. As in State v. Heckathorne, 347 Or. 474, 223 P.3d 1034 (decided this date), the issue in this case involves the warrant requirement in Article I, section 9, of the Oregon Constitution. Here, the question is whether the police were required...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases