1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.3d
  4. 220 P.3d
  5. 220 P.3d 426 (2009)
 

IN THE MATTER OF A.A.H.

2007800031, 2007800032; A141952.

220 P.3d 426 (2009)

231 Or. App. 565

In the Matter of A.A.H., aka A.A.H., aka A.D.; and K.C.H., aka K.G.-D., Children. DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, Petitioner-Respondent, v. C.G.-D., aka C.D.; and N.A.H., Appellants.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided October 28, 2009.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Margaret McWilliams argued the cause for appellant C. G.-D.

Ann Lechman-Su argued the cause for appellant N.A.H. With her on the brief was Johnson & Lechman-Su, PC.

Justice J. Rillera, Assistant Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent. With her on the brief were John R. Kroger, Attorney General, and Jerome Lidz, Solicitor General.

Dover A. Norris-York argued the cause for children. With her on the brief was Angela Sherbo.

Before LANDAU, Presiding Judge, and SCHUMAN, Judge, and ORTEGA, Judge.

PER CURIAM.

Mother and father appeal judgments terminating their parental rights to their two children on grounds of unfitness and neglect. They contend that the evidence was legally insufficient to justify termination of their parental rights on either of those grounds. On de novo review, State ex rel. Juv. Dept. v. Geist, 310 Or. 176, 194, 796 P.2d 1193 (1990), we conclude that the trial...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases