1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.3d
  4. 218 P.3d
  5. 218 P.3d 141 (2009)
 

SCHIELE v. MONTES

160514228; A134051.

218 P.3d 141 (2009)

231 Or. App. 43

Jim Dale SCHIELE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Mark MONTES, Cheryl Montes and the City of Springfield, Defendants-Respondents.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided September 23, 2009.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

David C. Force, Eugene, argued the cause and filed the briefs for appellant.

Gregory E. Skillman, Eugene, argued the cause for respondents Mark Montes and Cheryl Montes. On the brief were Danna C. Fogarty and Skillman & Fogarty, P.C.

Robert E. Franz, Jr., Springfield, argued the cause for respondent City of Springfield. On the brief were Andrea M. Nagles and Law Office of Robert E. Franz, Jr.

Before LANDAU, Presiding Judge, and SCHUMAN, Judge, and ORTEGA, Judge.

ORTEGA, J.

Plaintiff appeals a general judgment dismissing with prejudice his claim for intentional infliction of emotional distress and dismissing without prejudice his other claims, in which he sought damages based on emotional distress. We reverse and remand.

The relevant facts are procedural and undisputed. Plaintiff brought claims for malicious prosecution against Mark Montes; for intentional infliction of emotional distress (IIED) against Cheryl Montes...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases