ENGLISH v. PERB

Nos. 125766, 129958; A135928.

216 P.3d 342 (2009)

230 Or. App. 506

Katharine ENGLISH and Barbara Pinkerton, Petitioners, v. PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT BOARD, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided September 2, 2009.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Gregory Chaimov, Portland, argued the cause for petitioners. With him on the briefs were Jeffrey F. Renshaw, Vaness A. Usui, Davis Wright Temaine LLP, Mark Johnson, and Johnson & Lechman-Su PC.

Keith L. Kutler argued the cause for respondent. On the brief were Hardy Myers, Attorney General, Mary H. Williams, Solicitor General, and Michael C. Livingston, Senior Assistant Attorney General.

Before EDMONDS, Presiding Judge, and WOLLHEIM, Judge, and SERCOMBE, Judge.


EDMONDS, P.J.

Petitioners seek review of a final order of the Public Employees Retirement Board (PERB) that denied their requests to change their retirement allowances and remove their designated beneficiaries. PERB denied petitioners' requests because ORS 238.305(6) provides that a retired member of the Public Employees Retirement System (PERS) may change his or her retirement allowances only in situations involving death or divorce. Upon retirement, petitioners...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases