1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.3d
  4. 216 P.3d
  5. 216 P.3d 338 (2009)
 

STATE v. BAINBRIDGE

Nos. Z1233105; A135756.

216 P.3d 338 (2009)

230 Or. App. 500

STATE of Oregon, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Robert Gene BAINBRIDGE, Defendant-Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Filed September 2, 2009.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Michael E. Rose, Portland, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief was Steenson, Schumann, Tewksbury, Creighton and Rose, P.C.

Michael R. Washington, Senior Assistant Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Hardy Myers, Attorney General, and Mary H. Williams, Solicitor General.

Before EDMONDS, Presiding Judge, and WOLLHEIM, Judge, and SERCOMBE, Judge.

EDMONDS, P.J.

Defendant appeals a judgment of conviction for driving through a safety zone, ORS 811.030, a Class B violation. Before the trial court, defendant argued that the evidence was insufficient to establish the elements of the offense. Defendant reasserts that argument on appeal.1 We conclude that the evidence was insufficient to prove all of the elements and reverse.

In an appeal from a judgment involving a violation,...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases