1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.3d
  4. 209 P.3d
  5. 209 P.3d 851 (2009)
 

STATE v. HAMILTON

001239970; A135407.

209 P.3d 851 (2009)

229 Or. App. 94

STATE of Oregon, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Albert Lewis HAMILTON, aka Albert Lewis Goldsby, Defendant-Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided June 10, 2009.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robin A. Jones, Senior Deputy Public Defender, argued the cause for appellant. With her on the brief was Peter Gartlan, Chief Defender, Legal Services Division, Office of Public Defense Services.

Albert L. Hamilton filed appellant's supplemental brief pro se.

Janet A. Klapstein, Senior Assistant Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent. With her on the brief were Hardy Myers, Attorney General, and Mary H. Williams, Solicitor General.

Before SERCOMBE, Presiding Judge, and BREWER, Chief Judge, and DEITS, Senior Judge.

PER CURIAM.

Defendant assigns error to the failure to merge his robbery convictions under ORS 161.067(2). We determined in State v. Williams, 229 Or.App. 79, 209 P.3d 842 (2009), in similar circumstances, that, under ORS 161.067(2), robbery crimes committed against more than one victim do not merge. Defendant's pro se supplemental brief challenges the imposition of consecutive sentences...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases