1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.3d
  4. 208 P.3d
  5. 208 P.3d 1012 (2009)
 

STATE v. DE LA ROSA

060130106; A133793.

208 P.3d 1012 (2009)

228 Or. App. 666

STATE of Oregon, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Ramona E. DE LA ROSA, aka Ramona Edilia Delarosa, Defendant-Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided May 27, 2009.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

David E. Groom, Salem, argued the cause and filed the brief for appellant.

Katherine H. Waldo, Senior Assistant Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent. On the brief were Hardy Myers, Attorney General, Mary H. Williams, Solicitor General, and Douglas F. Zier, Assistant Attorney General.

Before LANDAU, Presiding Judge, and SCHUMAN, Judge, and ORTEGA, Judge.

SCHUMAN, J.

After the trial court denied defendant's motion to suppress evidence that a police officer found in her automobile and apartment, defendant was convicted of manufacture, delivery, and possession of a controlled substance. She appeals, arguing, as she did at a pretrial hearing, that the searches violated Article I, section 9, of the Oregon Constitution in several respects.1 We affirm...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases