1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.3d
  4. 208 P.3d
  5. 208 P.3d 488 (2009)
 

IN RE CONDUCT OF HENDRICK

(OSB 06-110; SC S056041).

208 P.3d 488 (2009)

346 Or. 98

In re complaint as to the CONDUCT OF R. Kevin HENDRICK, Accused.

Supreme Court of Oregon, En Banc.

Decided April 2, 2009.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mary A. Cooper, Assistant Disciplinary Counsel, Tigard, argued the cause and filed the brief for the Oregon State Bar.

Andrew P. Ositis, Salem, argued the cause and filed the brief for the accused.

PER CURIAM.

The issues in this lawyer disciplinary proceeding are whether the Oregon State Bar (Bar) committed a procedural error in connection with the accused's disciplinary proceeding and, if it did, whether the remedy for such an error is dismissal of the charges against the accused. For the reasons that follow, we conclude that the Bar did commit a procedural error, but that the appropriate remedy is to remand the case for a hearing before a new trial panel....

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases