COGAN v. CITY OF BEAVERTON

2008040, 2008041; A139820.

203 P.3d 303 (2009)

226 Or. App. 381

Mark C. COGAN and Leupold & Stevens, Inc., Respondents, v. CITY OF BEAVERTON, Petitioner. Leupold & Stevens, Inc., Respondent, v. City Of Beaverton, Petitioner.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided March 4, 2009.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

William J. Scheiderich, Beaverton, argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief was Alan A. Rappleyea.

Charles F. Hinkle, Portland, argued the cause for respondents. With him on the briefs was Stoel Rives LLP.

Before EDMONDS, Presiding Judge, and WOLLHEIM, Judge, and SERCOMBE, Judge.


WOLLHEIM, J.

Petitioner City of Beaverton (the city) seeks review of a decision of the Land Use Board of Appeals (LUBA) reversing the city's decision denying respondent Leupold & Stevens, Inc.'s (Leupold) petition for a minor boundary change.1 On review, the city contends that LUBA erred for two reasons. First, the city complains that LUBA did not properly construe the term "area of land"...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases