1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.3d
  4. 198 P.3d
  5. 198 P.3d 967 (2008)
 

CROOKED RIVER RANCH WATER CO. v. PUC

WJ 8; A134177.

198 P.3d 967 (2008)

224 Or. App. 485

CROOKED RIVER RANCH WATER COMPANY, Petitioner, v. PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION of Oregon, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided December 24, 2008.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

C. Robert Steringer, Portland, argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the briefs were Jona J. Maukonen, Harrang Long Gary Rudnick P.C., Timothy R. Gassner, and Glenn Sites Reeder & Gassner LLP.

Rolf Moan, Assistant Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Hardy Myers, Attorney General, and Mary H. Williams, Solicitor General.

Before EDMONDS, Presiding Judge, and WOLLHEIM, Judge, and RIGGS, Senior Judge.

EDMONDS, P.J.

Petitioner Crooked River Ranch Water Company (Crooked River) seeks judicial review of an order of the Public Utility Commission (PUC) that determined that petitioner was "subject to regulation" under ORS 757.063(1). That statute provides that an association—other than a cooperative—that furnishes water to its members is subject to PUC regulation in the same manner as a public utility "if 20 percent or more of the members of the association...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases