PER CURIAM.
In this criminal case, defendant contends that the trial court erred by denying his motion to suppress evidence found during a search of his person during a traffic stop. He contends that the officer unlawfully extended the duration of the traffic stop by asking him questions unrelated to the stop instead of either citing him for the offense or terminating the stop. The state concedes that, under State v. Rodgers,
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.