PER CURIAM.
Defendant was convicted of possession of a controlled substance, ORS 475.894, and appeals, arguing that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress evidence found when his jacket was searched. The state concedes that the trial court erred in denying defendant's motion to suppress. As explained below, we conclude that the state's concession is well taken. Accordingly, we reverse and remand.
Defendant was the driver of a vehicle that...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.