WYTHE v. HARRELL

054108L3; A133382.

197 P.3d 601 (2008)

224 Or. App. 215

Richard WYTHE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Bruce HARRELL, Defendant-Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided December 3, 2008.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Clayton C. Patrick, Portland, argued the cause and filed the briefs for appellant.

William V. Deatherage, Medford, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief was Frohnmayer, Deatherage, Pratt, Jamieson, Moore, Armosino & McGovern, P.C.

Before EDMONDS, Presiding Judge, and WOLLHEIM, Judge, and SERCOMBE, Judge.


EDMONDS, P.J.

In this legal malpractice case, plaintiff appeals after the trial court granted defendant's motion for summary judgment. Plaintiff contends that the trial court erred in granting summary judgment because there are genuine issues of material fact as to what advice plaintiff was given and whether he relied on that advice. We agree and therefore reverse and remand.

In reviewing a grant of summary judgment...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases