RUSHING v. SAIF CORP.

CV05070838; A134652.

196 P.3d 115 (2008)

223 Or. App. 665

Harold (Gene) RUSHING, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SAIF CORPORATION, an Oregon public benefit corporation, and Yvette Baker, an individual, Defendants-Respondents, and Judi Janzen and David Jordan, Defendants.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided November 12, 2008.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Eric J. Fjelstad argued the cause for appellant. With him on the briefs was Smith & Fjelstad.

Karla H. Alderman, Assistant Attorney General, argued the cause for respondents. With her on the brief were Hardy Myers, Attorney General, and Mary H. Williams, Solicitor General.

Before LANDAU, Presiding Judge, and SCHUMAN, Judge, and ORTEGA, Judge.


LANDAU, P.J.

Plaintiff initiated this action against SAIF Corporation1 for breach of contract and denial of due process under 42 U.S.C. section 1983, arising out of SAIF's rescission of an offer of employment. The parties filed cross-motions for summary judgment; plaintiff argued that he had a constitutionally protected expectation of employment, while SAIF argued that it is an at-will employer that may withdraw employment offers at any...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases