1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.3d
  4. 194 P.3d
  5. 194 P.3d 849 (2008)
 

MARELLA v. EMPLOYMENT DEPT.

07AB0480, A135366.

194 P.3d 849 (2008)

223 Or. App. 121

Patty L. MARELLA, Petitioner, v. EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT and Concorde Career Colleges, Inc., Respondents.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided October 15, 2008.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jona J. Maukonen, Portland, argued the cause for petitioner. With her on the brief were C. Robert Steringer and Harrang Long Gary Rudnick P.C.

Richard Wasserman, Attorney-in-Charge, Civil/Administrative Appeals Unit, waived appearance for respondent Employment Department.

No appearance for respondent Concorde Career Colleges, Inc.

Before EDMONDS, Presiding Judge, and WOLLHEIM, Judge, and SERCOMBE, Judge.

WOLLHEIM, J.

Claimant seeks review of an order of the Employment Appeals Board (EAB) that disqualified her from receiving unemployment benefits for a specified period of time because she refused an offer of suitable work without good cause. The issue raised here is whether the EAB erred, both factually and legally, in determining that claimant did not have good cause to refuse to accept a position because it did not provide health benefits. We review for errors of...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases