MURDOCH v. SAIF CORP.

0507098, 0603782; A135297.

194 P.3d 854 (2008)

223 Or. App. 144

In the Matter of the Compensation of Kirk J. Murdoch, Claimant. Kirk J. MURDOCH, Petitioner, v. SAIF CORPORATION and SB, Inc.— Sherman Brothers, Respondents.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided October 15, 2008.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

David C. Force argued the cause and filed the briefs for petitioner.

David L. Runner, Special Assistant Attorney General, argued the cause for respondents. With him on the brief were Hardy Myers, Attorney General, and Mary H. Williams, Solicitor General.

Before LANDAU, Presiding Judge, and SCHUMAN, Judge, and ORTEGA, Judge.


SCHUMAN, J.

Claimant seeks judicial review of an order of the Workers' Compensation Board (board) denying his occupational disease claim. At issue is whether the board correctly characterized claimant's diabetes, a condition unrelated to employment, as the major contributing cause of the disease that required amputation of his toe, thereby rendering the amputation noncompensable. Claimant contends that the diabetes merely...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases