1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.3d
  4. 229 P.3d
  5. 229 P.3d 540 (2010)
 

DEWEESE v. PATTERSON UTI DRILLING CO.

No. 101,686.

229 P.3d 540 (2010)

2010 OK 10

Donald Earl DEWEESE and Pamela Deweese, Plaintiffs/Appellees/Petitioners, v. PATTERSON UTI DRILLING COMPANY, a Limited Partnership, Defendant/Appellant/Respondent.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma.

As Corrected February 11, 2010.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Donald R. Liles, Aaron R. Sims, Liles & Sims, P.L.L.C., Woodward, Oklahoma, for Plaintiffs/Appellees.

Richard E. Hornbeek, Kevin E. Krahl, James S. Daniel, Hornbeek, Krahl Vitali & Braun, P.L.L.C., Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, for Defendants/Appellants.

EDMONDSON, C.J.

¶ 1 The issue on certiorari is whether the Court of Civil Appeals erred when it reversed the judgment entered upon a jury verdict in favor of plaintiffs, Donald Deweese and his wife, Pamela, because the trial court instructed on res ipsa loquitur.1 Plaintiffs contend the appellate court reached its erroneous decision by weighing the evidence and substituting its judgment on contested factual matters for that...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases