SER CINCINNATI ENQ. v. FORSTHOEFEL

No. 2021-0203.

212 N.E.3d 859 (2022)

170 Ohio St.3d 292

2022-Ohio-3580

The STATE EX REL. CINCINNATI ENQUIRER v. FORSTHOEFEL, Judge.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided October 11, 2022.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Graydon Head & Ritchey, L.L.P., Darren W. Ford , and Kellie A. Kulka , Cincinnati, for relator.

Spengler Nathanson, P.L.L., Teresa L. Grigsby , Toledo, and Jennifer A. McHugh , for respondent.


{¶ 1} In this original action, relator, the Cincinnati Enquirer ("the Enquirer"), requests writs of mandamus and prohibition against respondent, Ronald P. Forsthoefel, a judge on the Ashland County Common Pleas Court. The mandamus claim asks us to order Judge Forsthoefel to vacate his order sealing documents in a dissolution...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases