DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. VICK

No. 2021-1515.

200 N.E.3d 1118 (2022)

168 Ohio St.3d 683

2022-Ohio-2541

DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL. v. VICK.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided July 27, 2022.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Joseph M. Caligiuri , Disciplinary Counsel, and Michelle R. Bowman and Kelli C. Schmidt , Assistant Disciplinary Counsel, for relator.

Gary Allen Vick Jr., pro se.


{¶ 1} Respondent, Gary Allen Vick Jr., of Parma, Ohio, Attorney Registration No. 0071495, was admitted to the practice of law in Ohio in 1999. In an August 2021 second amended complaint, relator, disciplinary counsel, alleged that among other things, Vick had neglected the legal matters of six clients, failed to reasonably...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases