LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS OF OHIO et al.
v.
OHIO REDISTRICTING COMMISSION et al.
Bennett et al.
v.
Ohio Redistricting Commission et al.
Ohio Organizing Collaborative et al.
v.
Ohio Redistricting Commission et al.
Supreme Court of Ohio.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Dave Yost , Attorney General, and Organ Law, L.L.P., Erik J. Clark , and Ashley T. Merino , special counsel to Attorney General Dave Yost, for respondent Ohio Redistricting Commission.
Mark G. Kafantaris , Columbus; and Center for Competitive Democracy and Oliver Hall, in support of petitioners' objections for amici curiae Center for Competitive Democracy, Professor Ruth Colker, and Professor Mark Brown.
Belinda Spinosi, pro se, in support of petitioners' objections as amicus curiae, in case No. 2021-1193.
Per Curiam.
{¶ 1} Respondent Ohio Redistricting Commission1 adopted four General Assembly-district plans between September 2021 and March 2022. We invalidated each of those plans because they did not comply with Article XI, Sections 6(A) and 6(B) of the Ohio Constitution...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.