1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.E.3d
  4. 136 N.E.3d
  5. 136 N.E.3d 466 (2019)
 

CITY OF CLEVELAND v. STATE

No. 2018-0097.

136 N.E.3d 466 (2019)

157 Ohio St.3d 330

2019-Ohio-3820

The CITY OF CLEVELAND, Appellee, v. The STATE of Ohio, Appellant.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided September 24, 2019.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Barbara A. Langhenry , Cleveland Director of Law, Gary S. Singletary , Chief Counsel, and L. Stewart Hastings and Elizabeth M. Crook , Assistant Law Directors, for appellee.

Dave Yost , Attorney General, Benjamin M. Flowers , State Solicitor, Stephen P. Carney , Deputy Solicitor, and Zachary P. Keller , Assistant Attorney General, for appellant.

Frost Brown Todd, L.L.C., Philip K. Hartmann , and Yazan S. Ashrawi ; Columbus, and Garry E. Hunter , Athens, urging affirmance for amicus curiae Ohio Municipal League.

Scott & Winters Law Firm, L.L.C., and Joseph F. Scott , Cleveland, urging affirmance for amici curiae Campaign to Defend Local Solutions, Legal Scholars, and International Municipal Lawyers Association.

Eve V. Belfance , Akron Director of Law, and Brian D. Bremer , Assistant Law Director, urging affirmance for amicus curiae city of Akron.

Zach Klein , Columbus City Attorney, Lara N. Baker-Morrish , City Solicitor General, and Orly Ahroni , Assistant City Prosecutor, urging affirmance for amicus curiae Columbus City Attorney Zach Klein.

Graff and McGovern, L.P.A., and Luther L. Liggett Jr. , Columbus, urging reversal for amicus curiae AIA Ohio.

Ice Miller, L.L.P., and Patrick A. Devine , Columbus, urging reversal for amici curiae Ohio Contractors Association, Associated General Contractors of Ohio, National Federation of Independent Business, and Ohio Chamber of Commerce.

Fadel & Beyer, L.L.C., Timothy R. Fadel , and Jonah D. Grabelsky , Cleveland, urging reversal for amicus curiae International Union of Operating Engineers, Local 18.

Weston Hurd, L.L.P., Frederick T. Bills , and David T. Patterson , Columbus, urging reversal for amicus curiae American Council of Engineering Companies of Ohio.

{¶ 1} In this discretionary appeal from a judgment of the Eighth District Court of Appeals, we consider whether the enactment of R.C. 9.75, which prohibits a public authority from requiring that contractors on public-improvement projects employ a specific number or percentage...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases