1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.E.3d
  4. 122 N.E.3d
  5. 122 N.E.3d 144 (2018)
 

SATTERFIELD v. AMERITECH MOBILE COMMUNICATIONS, INC.

No. 2017-0684.

122 N.E.3d 144 (2018)

155 Ohio St.3d 463

2018-Ohio-5023

SATTERFIELD et al.; Intermessage Communications, Appellee, v. AMERITECH MOBILE COMMUNICATIONS, INC., et al.; Cincinnati SMSA Limited Partnership, Appellant.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided December 18, 2018.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Hahn, Loeser & Parks, L.L.P., Robert J. Fogarty , Dennis R. Rose , and Royce R. Remington , Cleveland; Gary, Naegele & Theado, L.L.C., and Thomas R. Theado , Lorain; Randy J. Hart, L.L.P., and Randy J. Hart ; Tricarichi & Carnes, L.L.C., and Carla M. Tricarichi , Cleveland; and Law Offices of Mark Griffin and Mark D. Griffin , for appellee.

Tucker Ellis, L.L.P., Irene C. Keyse-Walker , and Benjamin C. Sassé ; and Calfee, Cleveland, Halter & Griswold, L.L.P., and James F. Lang , Cleveland, for appellant.

Bricker & Eckler, L.L.P., Anne Marie Sferra , Drew Campbell , and Bryan Smeenk , Columbus, urging reversal for amici curiae Ohio Counsel of Retail Merchants, Ohio Insurance Institute, Ohio Alliance for Civil Justice, and Ohio Association of Civil Trial Attorneys.

Mac Murray & Shuster, L.L.P., Betty D. Montgomery , Columbus, and Patrick W. Skilliter , New Albany, urging reversal for amicus curiae Betty D. Montgomery, former Attorney General of Ohio.

K & L Gates, L.L.P., and J. Nicholas Ranjan ; and Donald T. Boyd , urging reversal for amici curiae Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America and Ohio Chamber of Commerce.

Steven T. Nourse , Columbus, urging reversal for amicus curiae Ohio Power Company, d.b.a. AEP Ohio.

Rocco O. D'Ascenzo , urging reversal for amicus curiae Duke Energy Ohio, Inc.

Joshua R. Eckert , urging reversal for amici curiae Ohio Edison Company, Cleveland Electric Illuminating Company, and Toledo Edison Company.

Michael J. Schuler , urging reversal for amicus curiae Dayton Power and Light Company.

{¶ 1} In this discretionary appeal from a judgment of the Eighth District Court of Appeals, we consider the parameters established by R.C. 4905.61 regarding the parties that have standing to bring a treble-damages action pursuant to that statute. Here, appellee, Intermessage Communications ("Intermessage"), and members of a proposed...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases