1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.E.3d
  4. 85 N.E.3d
  5. 85 N.E.3d 774 (2017)
 

STATE v. SCHIMMEL

No. 2017-CA-23.

85 N.E.3d 774 (2017)

2017-Ohio-7747

STATE of Ohio, Plaintiff-Appellant v. Curtis E. SCHIMMEL, Defendant-Appellee.

Court of Appeals of Ohio, Second District, Clark County.

Rendered on September 22, 2017.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

ANDREW R. PICEK , Atty. Reg. No. 0082121, ANDREW P. PICKERING , Atty. Reg. No. 0068770, Assistant Prosecuting Attorneys, Clark County Prosecutor's Office, 50 East Columbia Street, Fourth Floor, Springfield, Ohio 45502, Attorneys for Plaintiff-Appellant.

ERIC E. WILLISON , Atty. Reg. No. 0066795, BRADLEY P. KOFFEL , Atty. Reg. No. 0062184, 1801 Watermark Drive, Suite 350, Columbus, Ohio 43215, Attorneys for Defendant-Appellee.

OPINION

{¶ 1} In this case, Plaintiff-Appellant, the State of Ohio, appeals from a trial court decision granting a motion to suppress filed by Defendant-Appellee, Curtis Schimmel. In support of its appeal, the State contends that the trial court erred in granting Schimmel's motion to suppress, because Schimmel...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases