1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.E.3d
  4. 69 N.E.3d
  5. 69 N.E.3d 754 (2016)
 

RICHARDSON v. CLINICAL COMPUTING P.L.C.

No. C-150594.

69 N.E.3d 754 (2016)

2016-Ohio-8065

Jack N. RICHARDSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CLINICAL COMPUTING P.L.C., and Clinical Computing, Inc., Defendants-Appellants, and Clinical Computing, U.K. Ltd., Defendant.

Court of Appeals of Ohio, First District, Hamilton County.

December 7, 2016.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Christopher Ragonesi , for plaintiff-appellant.

Taft, Stettinius & Hollister, LLP, and Doreen Canton , for defendants-appellees.

OPINION

{¶ 1} Plaintiff-appellant Jack N. Richardson appeals the judgment of the trial court granting the defendants' motion to dismiss his complaint as to Clinical Computing PLC and Clinical Computing, Inc. Richardson, in his sole assignment of error, argues that the trial court erred in granting...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases