IN RE GRAND JURY PROCEEDING JOHN DOE

Nos. 2015-1181 and 2015-1182.

150 Ohio St.3d 398 (2016)

2016-Ohio-8001

IN RE GRAND JURY PROCEEDING OF JOHN DOE.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided December 7, 2016.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Timothy McGinty , Cuyahoga County Prosecuting Attorney, and Matthew E. Meyer and Christopher D. Schroeder , Assistant Prosecuting Attorneys; and Daniel J. Kasaris , Senior Assistant Ohio Attorney General and Deputy Cuyahoga County Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee.

Walter Haverfield, L.L.P., Ralph E. Cascarilla , and Darrell A. Clay ; and Tucker Ellis, L.L.P., and John F. McCaffrey , for appellant partnership.

Martin G. Weinberg, P.C., and Martin G. Weinberg ; and Baker Hostetler, L.L.P., George A. Stamboulidis , and Lisa M. Ghannoum , for appellant president.


{¶ 1} In this case, we are asked to determine whether an order denying a motion to quash a grand-jury subpoena and ordering a party to testify or produce documents is a final order that may be appealed. We hold that it is.

I. Case Background

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases